Assurance Argument
As part of its 10-year Comprehensive Accreditation process, the University is required to submit an Assurance Argument and supporting evidence. The Argument assures the Higher Learning Commission that USAO meets the required criteria. The Assurance Argument is available here for university and public review.
The Criteria for Accreditation are the standards of quality by which the Commission
determines whether an institution merits accreditation or reaffirmation of accreditation.
They are as follows:
The institution’s mission is clear and articulated publicly; it guides the institution’s
operations. Core Components 1.A. The institution’s mission is broadly understood within the institution and guides
its operations. 1.B. The mission is articulated publicly. 1.C. The institution understands the relationship between its mission and the diversity
of society. 1.D. The institution’s mission demonstrates commitment to the public good. The institution acts with integrity; its conduct is ethical and responsible. Core Components 2.A. The institution operates with integrity in its financial, academic, personnel,
and auxiliary functions; it establishes and follows policies and processes for fair and ethical
behavior on the part of its governing board, administration, faculty, and staff. 2.B. The institution presents itself clearly and completely to its students and to
the public with regard to its programs, requirements, faculty and staff, costs to
students, control, and accreditation relationships. 2.C. The governing board of the institution is sufficiently autonomous to make decisions
in the best interest of the institution and to assure its integrity. 2.D. The institution is committed to freedom of expression and the pursuit of truth
in teaching and learning. 2.E. The institution’s policies and procedures call for responsible acquisition, discovery
and application of knowledge by its faculty, students, and staff. The institution provides high quality education, wherever and however its offerings
are delivered. Core Components 3.A. The institution’s degree programs are appropriate to higher education. 3.B. The institution demonstrates that the exercise of intellectual inquiry and the
acquisition, application, and integration of broad learning and skills are integral
to its educational programs. 3.C. The institution has the faculty and staff needed for effective, high-quality
programs and student services. 3.D. The institution provides support for student learning and effective teaching. 3.E. The institution fulfills the claims it makes for an enriched educational environment. The institution demonstrates responsibility for the quality of its educational programs,
learning environments, and support services, and it evaluates their effectiveness
for student learning through processes designed to promote continuous improvement. Core Components 4.A. The institution demonstrates responsibility for the quality of its educational
programs. 4.B. The institution demonstrates a commitment to educational achievement and improvement
through ongoing assessment of student learning. 4.C. The institution demonstrates a commitment to educational improvement through
ongoing attention to retention, persistence, and completion rates in its degree and
certificate programs. The institution’s resources, structures, and processes are sufficient to fulfill its
mission, improve the quality of its educational offerings, and respond to future challenges
and opportunities. The institution plans for the future. Core Components 5.A. The institution’s resource base supports its current educational programs and
its plans for maintaining and strengthening their quality in the future. 5.B. The institution’s governance and administrative structures promote effective
leadership and support collaborative processes that enable the institution to fulfill
its mission. 5.C. The institution engages in systematic and integrated planning. 5.D. The institution works systematically to improve its performance.
Criteria
Criterion 1 - Mission
Criterion 2 - Integrity: Ethical and Responsible Conduct
Criterion 3 - Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support
Criterion 4 - Teaching and Learning: Evaluation and Improvement
Criterion 5 - Resources, Planning, and Institutional Effectiveness
